Post by huntleybrian8 on Jul 4, 2018 22:49:15 GMT
I propose that safties no longer be interchangeable.
Strong Safety must play Strong Safety and Free Safety must play Free Safety. If they are forced to play out of position due to injury, they are considered to be a 0-0 just like any other position player whom plays out of position per OFM rules.
The interchangeability has made the position far too strong. 5 and 6 run rated Strong Safeties who conveniently move to Free Safety and then wander all over the field at will is just too powerful. Their SOM run ratings were designed to work in conjunction with the flat pass containment rules not turn them into Butkus, Lambert, Ray Lewis etc.
Please don't arbitrarily vote "No" because we allow ORT to play OLT etc. It's not the same argument as they are still limited to being on the OL. It's the same with D-Lineman, Cornerbacks etc.
Please vote accordingly.
Thanks,
Brian D
Patriots/Jaguars
Strong Safety must play Strong Safety and Free Safety must play Free Safety. If they are forced to play out of position due to injury, they are considered to be a 0-0 just like any other position player whom plays out of position per OFM rules.
The interchangeability has made the position far too strong. 5 and 6 run rated Strong Safeties who conveniently move to Free Safety and then wander all over the field at will is just too powerful. Their SOM run ratings were designed to work in conjunction with the flat pass containment rules not turn them into Butkus, Lambert, Ray Lewis etc.
Please don't arbitrarily vote "No" because we allow ORT to play OLT etc. It's not the same argument as they are still limited to being on the OL. It's the same with D-Lineman, Cornerbacks etc.
Please vote accordingly.
Thanks,
Brian D
Patriots/Jaguars
